How Primary Care Providers Can Improve Sex Education Programs

Sexuality is a vital component of overall health, yet it’s often overlooked in healthcare settings. For primary care providers (PCPs), addressing patients’ sexual health needs is crucial for holistic care. However, many healthcare professionals, including PCPs, report feeling unprepared to discuss sexuality with patients due to inadequate training. This gap highlights a significant opportunity for primary care providers to improve sex education programs, ensuring both professionals and patients are better equipped to address sexual health proactively and effectively.

The importance of sexuality extends beyond physical health, encompassing emotional well-being, intimacy, and personal identity. Comprehensive sex education is not just about preventing STIs and unwanted pregnancies; it’s about fostering healthy attitudes towards sexuality, promoting open communication, and empowering individuals to make informed decisions about their sexual health. Primary care providers, as trusted and accessible healthcare figures, are ideally positioned to champion and enhance these programs.

Understanding the Gap in Current Sex Education

Many healthcare professionals, including those in primary care, acknowledge the importance of addressing sexual health but often lack the confidence and skills to initiate these conversations. Research indicates that while a significant majority of healthcare providers agree that sexual issues should be addressed, a far smaller percentage routinely discuss these topics with their patients. Barriers include a lack of specific training, time constraints during appointments, and personal discomfort in discussing sensitive topics like sexuality.

Furthermore, traditional medical education often gives limited attention to sexual health. Studies show that medical schools frequently dedicate minimal hours to human sexuality education, leaving graduates feeling unprepared to handle patients’ sexual health concerns. This educational deficit perpetuates a cycle of discomfort and avoidance, hindering effective patient care. This is further complicated by cultural factors and biases that healthcare providers may hold, potentially affecting the care provided to diverse populations, including LGBTQ+ individuals.

The Pivotal Role of Primary Care Providers

Primary care providers are at the forefront of patient care, often serving as the first point of contact for health concerns. This accessibility and established patient-provider relationship make PCPs uniquely influential in shaping patients’ understanding of sexual health. Their involvement in sex education programs can significantly enhance the reach and effectiveness of these initiatives.

PCPs can contribute in several key ways:

• Integrating Sexual Health into Routine Care: By incorporating sexual health screenings and discussions into regular check-ups, PCPs can normalize these conversations and make patients more comfortable seeking advice and care.
• Providing Age-Appropriate Education: PCPs see patients across all age groups, from adolescents to older adults. They can tailor sex education to meet the specific needs and developmental stages of their patients, addressing topics relevant to each age group.
• Addressing Diverse Needs: PCPs are trained to provide patient-centered care, acknowledging the diverse backgrounds, sexual orientations, and gender identities of their patients. They can ensure sex education programs are inclusive and address the specific sexual health needs of all individuals.
• Early Detection and Prevention: By proactively discussing sexual health, PCPs can play a crucial role in the early detection of sexual health problems, including STIs, sexual dysfunction, and reproductive health issues. They can also provide essential preventive education and counseling.
• Referral and Collaboration: PCPs can act as a bridge to specialized care. When patients require more in-depth support or treatment for sexual health concerns, PCPs can make appropriate referrals to specialists and collaborate with other healthcare professionals to ensure comprehensive care.

Strategies for Primary Care Providers to Enhance Sex Education Programs

Based on research into effective sexuality education for healthcare professionals, several strategies emerge for PCPs to improve sex education programs:

1. Advocate for Comprehensive Training: PCPs can advocate for enhanced and mandatory sexual health education during medical training and continuing professional development. This training should go beyond basic anatomy and STI prevention to include communication skills, addressing personal biases, and understanding diverse sexual health needs.

2. Implement Brief, Targeted Interventions: Even short educational sessions can significantly improve healthcare professionals’ comfort and competence in addressing sexual health. PCPs can participate in and promote brief, focused training programs within their practices and healthcare systems. The “BETTER” model (Bring up, Explain, Tell, Time, Educate, Record) provides a simple, structured approach for initiating conversations about sexuality within routine consultations.

3. Utilize Interactive and Case-Based Learning: Effective training programs often incorporate interactive methods like group discussions, role-playing, and case studies. These approaches help healthcare professionals develop practical skills in communicating about sensitive topics and apply their knowledge in realistic scenarios. PCPs can seek out and participate in training that uses these active learning techniques.

4. Develop and Utilize Patient Education Resources: PCPs can contribute to the development of accessible and culturally sensitive patient education materials on various aspects of sexual health. These resources can supplement conversations during appointments and empower patients to learn more about their sexual health in their own time.

5. Foster an Open and Supportive Clinic Environment: Creating a clinic environment where patients feel comfortable discussing sexual health is paramount. This includes ensuring privacy, using inclusive language, and demonstrating a non-judgmental attitude. PCPs can lead by example in fostering this open communication.

6. Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Sexuality is a multidisciplinary issue. PCPs should collaborate with other healthcare professionals, such as nurses, psychologists, social workers, and specialists in sexual health, to create comprehensive and integrated sex education programs. This team approach can ensure that patients receive holistic care that addresses all aspects of their sexual health.

Overcoming Barriers and Moving Forward

Implementing these strategies may encounter barriers, including time constraints, resource limitations, and lingering discomfort around discussing sexuality. However, the benefits of improved sex education programs – including better patient outcomes, increased preventative care, and a more holistic approach to health – far outweigh these challenges.

By prioritizing sexual health education and actively working to enhance programs, primary care providers can play a transformative role in promoting sexual well-being for all their patients. This proactive approach not only addresses a critical gap in healthcare but also contributes to a more open, informed, and healthy society where sexuality is recognized as an integral part of overall wellness.

Conclusion

Primary care providers are essential figures in improving sex education programs. By advocating for better training, implementing practical strategies in their practices, and fostering open communication, PCPs can significantly enhance the quality and reach of sex education. Investing in these improvements is an investment in the holistic health and well-being of individuals and communities, ensuring that everyone has access to the knowledge and care they need to navigate their sexual health confidently and responsibly. The journey towards better sexual health outcomes begins with empowering primary care providers to lead the way in comprehensive and effective sex education.

References

[1] Štulhofer, A.; Landripet, I. Sexual Health of Medical Students in Croatia: The Role of Medical Education. Sex. Educ. Sex. 2017, 17, 241-254.

[2] World Health Organization. Defining Sexual Health: Report of a Technical Consultation on Sexual Health; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.

[3] De Sutter, P.; T’Sjoen, G. Sexuality after Cancer. ESMO Open 2015, 1, e000038.

[4] Haboubi, N.H.; Lincoln, N.B. Management of Sexual Problems by Health Professionals after Stroke. Clin. Rehabil. 2003, 17, 722-729.

[5] Dennerstein, L.; Dudley, E.C.; Guthrie, J.R.; Hayes, R.D. Sexuality, and Its Problems, in Women with Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2000, 23, 1349-1354.

[6] McCabe, M.P. Education about Sexuality: Are Health Professionals Adequately Trained? Sex. Disabil. 2001, 19, 227-238.

[7] Eliason, M.J.; Schope, R. Barriers to Providing Culturally Competent Care. West. J. Nurs. Res. 2001, 23, 93-115.

[8] Crisp, C.; Grossman, B.A. How to Improve the Health Care of Lesbians and Gay Men: 25 Recommendations for Clinicians. WMJ-WIS. Med. J. 2001, 100, 32-37.

[9] Bober, S.L.; Recklitis, C.J.; Bober, S.L.; Recklitis, C.J. Psychosocial Impact of Cancer across the Lifespan. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003, 21, 3703-3728.

[10] Verze, P.; Bettocchi, C.; Cai, T.; Mirone, V.; Palmieri, A.; Bartoletti, R.; Verze, P.; Bettocchi, C.; Cai, T.; Mirone, V.; et al. The Management of Sexual Dysfunction in Patients with Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome. Arch. Ital. Urol. Androl. 2011, 83, 173-178.

[11] Herbitz, G.P.; Demian, N.M.; Shehata, F.A.; El Gamal, S.M.; Abbas, M.A.; el-Nahas, A.M. Sexual Function in Egyptian Women with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J. Sex Marital Ther. 2008, 34, 347-357.

[12] Alzaid, A.A.; El-Sherbeeni, E.S. Sexual Dysfunction in Saudi Women with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J. Sex Marital Ther. 2005, 31, 415-422.

[13] Stokes, J.; Mears, J. Practice Nurses’ Attitudes towards Discussing Sexual Health Issues with Patients. Sex. Health 2000, 17, 17-20.

[14] Fronek, P.; Booth, J.; Kendall, M.; Miller, M.; Geraghty, T. An Evaluation of a Sexuality Training Program for an Interdisciplinary Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Team. Sex. Disabil. 2005, 23, 159-173.

[15] Simpson, G.; Walker, L.; Evans, C. Staff Training in Sexuality: An Evaluation of Changes in Knowledge, Skills and Comfort Levels. Disabil. Rehabil. 2006, 28, 777-783.

[16] Post, M.W.M.; van Driel, J.H.; Gouwerok, E.G.; Verhoeven, C.J.M.; van Driel, J.H.; Gouwerok, E.G.; Verhoeven, C.J.M. Evaluation of a Sexology Training for Rehabilitation Professionals. J. Rehabil. Med. 2008, 40, 22-28.

[17] Fronek, P.; Kennedy, P.; Miller, M.; Thomas, S.; McKinley, J.; Geraghty, T. Two-Year Follow-Up of a Sexuality Training Program for Practitioners in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2011, 40, 939-947.

[18] Higgins, A.; Barker, P.; Begley, C.M. Sexuality and Mental Health Nursing: An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of an Education Programme for Mental Health Staff. J. Psychiatr. Ment. Health Nurs. 2012, 19, 389-396.

[19] Quinn, C.; Happell, B. Mental Health Nurses’ Experiences of Using the BETTER Model to Assist in Raising the Topic of Sexuality with Patients. Int. J. Ment. Health Nurs. 2012, 21, 207-214.

[20] Sung, H.C.; Lin, I.F. Effects of a Sexual Health Care Education Program on Nursing Students’ Knowledge, Attitude and Self-Efficacy in Taiwan. J. Clin. Nurs. 2013, 22, 2404-2413.

[21] Quinn, C.; Scanlon, M.; Usher, K.; Baker, P.; Happell, B. An Exploration of the Longer-Term Use of the BETTER Model by Mental Health Nurses. Issues Ment. Health Nurs. 2013, 34, 258-264.

[22] Bauer, M.; Fetherstonhaugh, D.; Tarzia, L.; Chenco, C.; Nay, R. Sexuality and Residential Aged Care: Attitudes and Beliefs of Residential Aged Care Staff before and after an Education Intervention. Educ. Gerontol. 2013, 39, 419-432.

[23] Jónsdóttir, H.R.B.; Jónsson, T.; Gunnarsdóttir, E.D.; Steingrímsdóttir, H.A. Evaluation of an Educational Intervention for Health Professionals in Oncology on Sexual Health Care. Support. Care Cancer 2016, 24, 3515-3523.

[24] Monga, U.; Tan, C.T.; Ostermann, H.A. Sexuality in Cancer Patients. Semin. Oncol. 1997, 24, 63-68.

[25] Annon, J.S. The Behavioral Treatment of Sexual Problems. Brief Therapy; Harper & Row: New York, NY, USA, 1976.

[26] Davis, S.N.; Lambert, S.D.; Girgis, A.; Turner, J.; McElduff, P.; Ussher, J.M. Cancer Care Professionals’ Perspectives on Addressing Patient Sexuality: Part 1—Barriers and Facilitators. Psychooncology 2004, 13, 597-609.

[27] Leiblum, S.R. A Survey of Sexuality Education in US Medical Schools: 1999. J. Sex Marital Ther. 2001, 27, 19-27.

[28] Lindau, S.T.; Abramsohn, J.S.; Liss, C.L.; Javeed, N.; Ehdaivand, F.; Gavrilova, N.; Grover, S.; Van Horn, L.; Schneider, J.A. Self-Reported Sexual Activity and Function in Older Adults. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2007, 55, 1480-1487.

[29] Balon, R. Sexuality and Sexual Dysfunctions at the Interface of Medicine and Psychiatry. Psychosom. Med. 2009, 71, 587-588.

[30] Reissing, E.D.; Binik, Y.M.; Khalil, T.; Carrier, S. Sexuality Education of Health Professionals: A Needs Assessment. J. Sex Educ. Ther. 204, 29, 294-311.

[31] Basson, R. The Evolution of the Concept of Female Sexual Dysfunction: The Importance of Integrating Mind and Body. Urol. Clin. N. Am. 2005, 32, 455-464.

[32] Bancroft, J. Sexual Problems in Men and Women. BMJ 2002, 325, 1335-1339.