Detroit DD13 Reviews: A Farmer’s Frustrating Experience

The Detroit DD13 engine is known for its power and performance, but how does it hold up in real-world applications? This review delves into the firsthand experience of a farmer with a 2016 Freightliner Cascadia equipped with a DD13 and approximately 250,000 miles on the odometer. While initially promising, the truck quickly became a source of constant frustration and expensive repairs.

Initial Impressions and Performance

The truck, originally a fleet vehicle with comprehensive service records, initially impressed with its smooth ride, responsive transmission, and robust engine power. The Jake brake also proved effective and easy to use. However, these positive aspects were soon overshadowed by a series of recurring problems.

Recurring Problems and Expensive Repairs

One of the first issues encountered was the engine’s air intake system. The honeycomb filter design proved extremely susceptible to clogging from debris, particularly “beeswings,” requiring frequent cleaning and even the need to carry a spare filter. To prevent debris from entering the cabin, window screen material was applied to the cabin air intake.

The engine also exhibited an unusual idling issue, shutting down after a few minutes at low idle unless the RPMs were increased. This problem, while manageable, hinted at underlying electronic or sensor issues.

More significant problems arose within the first year and a half of ownership. Two critical engine modules failed, requiring replacement. One module was readily available, but the other proved incredibly difficult to source, eventually requiring a used part from a junkyard and specialized programming at a Freightliner dealership. This repair alone cost over $700 for the part and an additional $100-$150 for programming.

Subsequent issues included a faulty cooling fan that wouldn’t shut off, requiring another shop visit and diagnostic work. The following winter, the clutch unexpectedly failed, necessitating a tow and a three-month wait for parts. While the downtime was partially mitigated by the farm’s other trucks, the extended repair time and associated costs were significant.

Further complications included a faulty DEF sensor, indicating an empty tank when it was full, leading to yet another round of repairs. Wiring issues and corrosion, particularly around the batteries located under the passenger seat, added to the growing list of problems.

Most recently, the truck experienced low battery power after sitting idle for a week. Upon inspection, it was discovered that the truck utilizes four Group 31 AGM batteries, a costly type often used in high-end vehicles. Replacing these batteries could cost upwards of $1000.

Conclusion: A Disappointing Experience

While the Detroit DD13 engine initially delivered on its promise of power and performance, the continuous stream of problems and high repair costs have left the owner deeply dissatisfied with the Freightliner truck. The frequency of issues, coupled with the difficulty in sourcing parts and the expense of repairs, raises serious questions about the long-term reliability and cost-effectiveness of this particular vehicle. This experience suggests that potential buyers should carefully consider the potential maintenance challenges and costs associated with the Detroit DD13 and Freightliner trucks, especially those with higher mileage. The owner’s experience serves as a cautionary tale, highlighting the importance of thorough pre-purchase inspections and a realistic assessment of potential long-term ownership costs.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *